My first presidential election was in 1976 where voters were unhappy with the state of the federal government. It was an era of high inflation (“whip inflation now” WIN), oil crises (OPEC), the Viet Nam war, the cold war, and the war on poverty. There was a general dissatisfaction with Washington D. C.
I remember that election. The appointed president, Gerald Ford, was running against the Washington outsider, Jimmy Carter, the former Governor and peanut farmer from Georgia. A new, young, republican, I voted for Gerald Ford.
The issues in that election, in addition to those stated above, were the trade deficit, the national debt, social security reform, health care’s rising costs, and assorted other issues.
I won’t delve into the reasons or the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness of each administration but it is clear to me that in the 10 elections since then the American people have elected individuals promising change to the Washington establishment. Carter (governor), Reagan (governor), Bush (a one-term Washington insider exception – but as a Reagan disciple, a point can still be made), Clinton (governor), George W. Bush (governor), Obama (a rookie senator, so new that he may qualify as an outsider), Trump (a businessman outsider from New York).
I think it is clear that Americans want change. We want results from out Washington
officials. Do we have to wait? How come Washington is so ineffective in
making changes? Has ideology supplanted
the altruism of public service? We have
been looking to ‘drain the swamp’ since at least the 1970’s. I just don't know how we do that. Term limits? Isn't that what elections are all about?
No comments:
Post a Comment